Talk:The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Kaguya-chan (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The first paragraph in Composition and publication has no source
 * Done. References entered. Susanne2009NYC (talk) 19:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. References entered. Susanne2009NYC (talk) 19:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Wonderful work. It now meets the GA criteria. Keep up the good work! Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)