Talk:The Strange Death of Vincent Foster

Untitled
Did Coulter really "rip" it? The source says ""Even if Christopher Ruddy's The Strange Death of Vince Foster was considered a conservative hoax book, it was also conservatives who discredited it." Chapter Six Endnote " She says "even if" that's not really denying it or "ripping it". Popish Plot (talk) 14:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on The Strange Death of Vincent Foster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060210040224/http://archives.cjr.org:80/year/96/2/foster.asp to http://archives.cjr.org/year/96/2/foster.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Subject of the book
Does it seem strange to anyone else that the subject of this book is shown to be the "Suicide of Vince Foster" when the book questions that narrative? Maybe a more suitable, and more neutral, subject would be actually the "Death of Vince Foster", since it does not presume to define the cause. I would change it myself, but I don't really feel like getting into it with some lunatic leftist who has assigned himself/herself/itself/themself to be the defender of this article. Clearly it is a political choice that goes against any pretense of neutrality. Eegorr (talk) 23:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)