Talk:The Sweet Hereafter (film)/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:The Sweet Hereafter poster.jpg
Image:The Sweet Hereafter poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Why does the plot summary contain a major plot spoiler? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benbenbenben (talk • contribs) 14:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * See WP:Spoiler. An article about a book, film should contain all the important plot elements. When you read a plot "section" for something in Wikipedia you know there will be spoilers. In fact, the article is missing an important piece: How did the film end? Was the situation resolved, or was there an open ending? Averell (talk) 17:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Lawsuit
I've never seen the movie. Who, exactly, were the parents sueing? Why would knowledge that the driver was speeding hurt the case? Czolgolz (talk) 02:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

This plot summary sucks
First of all, it's basically copy/pasted from the book wiki page (which is also awful). Second of all it doesn't mention the incestuous relationship between Nicole and Sam, Stephens' meeting with one of Zoe's childhood on the airplane, and probably more (important) plot details I can't remember right now.72.211.192.245 (talk) 00:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Nicole and her father (specifically the film version)
Even though the book, from what I understand (didn't read it), depicts their relationship as abusive it isn't so in the film. You can see them in one scene laying on a haystack, smiling to each other and french kissing. This doesn't seem abusive to me. The film suggests that she was acting out of spite when she lied in her deposition. The night before that she tells him she's no longer his beautiful rockstar girl. Seems like she had a crush on her dad, which the accident dispelled by making her disabled and now she can't live up to her father expectations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.226.52.125 (talk) 22:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)