Talk:The Tale of the Pie and the Patty-Pan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 5, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Writing is generally good enough for WP:GA quality. It could use a bit of copyediting for flow, readability, and a rare comment but in some places actually seems too succinct - would suggest contacting WP:GOCE, relevant WikiProject talk pages, and doing a peer review, going forward.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Very interesting stuff, I especially like the in-depth sect, Development and publication. I would highly suggest expanding the sect, Scholarly commentaries - perhaps even double or triple in size, with other secondary source coverage.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be neutral, yes.
 * 5. Article stability? No major issues upon inspection of article edit history, or talk page.
 * 6. Images?: 7 images used, all seem to be free use on this project, or located on Wikimedia Commons. Passes here, as well.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — -- Cirt (talk) 05:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)