Talk:The Tank (theater)

Neutrality disputed tag
Hi, you added a neutrality disputed tag to this page. Were there any particular points that you felt betrayed a non-neutral POV? I've been especially careful in crafting this page, especially vis-a-vis the sourcing, but please let me know what other work you think the page could use. Thanks, Bob Amnertiopsis ∴ChatMe! 23:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi - being a former off-Broadway director, I love to see articles about that aspect of NY theater. Here's my view on POV (which also includes articles which have a promotional tone), so any article which begins to sound like a brochure promoting the subject is something which I tag POV. So when I see lines like "The Tank offers free performance space...", or "The company was able to secure an inexpensive month-to-month lease", and "Artists do not pay to use the venue and are paid a portion of the ticket sales, even if their shows are low-selling". On the whole, my "POV radar" was only very minimally set off on this article. I think the main issue is there is no negative balance to the article. Why did it have to move 3 times?  But the POV issue is very minimal, I wouldn't squawk if the tag was removed. Hope this helps.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I concur. This article reads like an advertisement. It needs a heavy rewrite to bring it in line with neutrality guidelines. oknazevad (talk) 23:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)