Talk:The Tempestry Project/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: I'll take this one. Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 20:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Comments

 * This is an elegant and well-cited article and I don't expect I'll have many comments to make on it.


 * "Data art" should be linked in the lead. So maybe should things like "Trump administration" and "climatologist".


 * I've put Mathematics and art in the See also list, but it may be that the section on "mathekniticians" deserves a mention directly here also. You could, for instance, use this to lead into the article, or into the 'Similar artworks' section, i.e. maths/art ... data art ... Tempestries (getting more and more specialised).


 * I wonder, too, if a more general mention of Science in art wouldn't be helpful. You might use sources such as "11 Fascinating Artists Inspired by Science". Now there's an interesting redlink ...


 * "will sometimes vary slightly" - should be "will inevitably vary" or near offer.


 * Suggest that the image in 'Display' should be a deal wider (set parameter "|upright=1.7", say) as its display area is much smaller than the other images.


 * The 'Similar artworks' section should maybe be divided into sections on works influenced by Tempestries, and data art more generally.

Overall, there's really nothing much wrong with this article, and I expect to see it at GA shortly. Nice work. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for starting the review, and for the kind words! I'll get to work on these things! --valereee (talk) 10:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Well I think that's all done really. Certainly there is scope for other articles on science and art, and eventually a navbar template too perhaps on the lines of Template:Mathematics and art. There is much interest in photography of science, too, surely an article in that. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , I actually just created Climate change art from the info in this article, thinking it's a pretty fair stub at this point. I had literally been thinking that I was finding enough articles about Climate change art that it could be an article when you mentioned a redlink! Thanks again for the exceptionally constructive review! --valereee (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That's great to hear, thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)