Talk:The Third God

Description section not up to standard
The Description section is not quite up to Wikipedia standards, full of subjective evaluations that really do not belong in an encyclopedia article. Future editors might want to look at the entry for The Chosen; while that article still needs some work, it is a good model to follow. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 22:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

In addition to the issues TechBear brought up, the description section is identical to an amazon review of the novel at https://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R33SCGHMLX4MIF/ref=cm_cr_srp_d_rdp_perm?ie=UTF8. As the usernames match I believe the reviewer decided to reuse their review for the wikipedia page, rather than quoting someone else's; nonetheless, I have a suspicion that this isn't good editing policy. I've added a link to the review but lack sufficient knowledge of the subject to do much more. 2600:8806:409:5600:CC4D:E05C:A327:A5B7 (talk) 23:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)