Talk:The Three Ages of the Interior Life

The whole article is sourced to the book that is the subject of the article
Is this really okay? Isn't the point of Wikipedia to use secondary sources? Fred Zepelin (talk) 22:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Secondary and tertiary sources in English are surprisingly difficult to find regarding this specific work. Collaboration in this regard is welcome, especially from French sources. Achirra (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, it's difficult to find anything regarding the reception of this single work, though there is probably plenty on Garrigou-Lagrange himself. I think it might be because he was overshadowed by some of the theologians he disagreed with, but I don't have a definitive source on this. Help for an Influcene/Reception section would be appreciated. Achirra (talk) 13:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Well, I think I'm going to take a break from this one for a bit. It remains very general, but specifics will take a lot more research if they are to be based on secondary and tertiary sources. In any case, the sources have been diversified much more to the point that I'm going to take down the advisory banners regarding the sources.Achirra (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)