Talk:The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power/GA1

GA pass
This is a great article, in my opinion, and I would recommend upping the ante to Featured Article review candidacy. I'm sure they'll find plenty of holes for you to revise, but this article isn't far off. Dylan 23:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well-written? Yes; strong conformity to MoS.
 * Factually accurate and verifiable? Extensive use of inline citations.
 * Broad? Provides excellent coverage of the article from many angles (context, analysis, fallout, etc.).
 * Netural? Surprisingly even-handed for an article documenting a controversy.
 * Stable? Appears to be.
 * Illustrated? A bit light on illustrations, but it's a difficult topic to illustrate. Kudos to whatever creative mind thought to scan the official judicial entries/documents and use them.
 * Thank you. I especially appreciated your statement above: Netural? Surprisingly even-handed for an article documenting a controversy. Cirt 00:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC).
 * Ah. Thank you for that clarification.  Cirt 00:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC).