Talk:The Times (TV program)

Untitled discussion
To Sarah: why did you remove this information?
 * "The Times was a critical success - respected and praised by critics for its slick, entertaining approach to news - but it attracted few viewers in its ridiculous and irregular late-night timeslots (it was bumped around the schedules, sometimes waiting until almost midnight before it went to air)."

The show was supported and praised by the critics in major newspapers. The show did attract poor ratings. The show did have an inconsistent timeslot, and often would air very late, and in the 2 years the show aired, it aired on three different days - hardly consistent. The show did have a timeslot proven to be unsuitible for current affairs shows.

I don't see anything wrong with my statement, yet you seem to think I made it up? Austvguy 03:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Unless you cite some sources for those claims, it's editorial comment and against NPOV. Please don't conclude I think you're making things up or doing something shifty as I don't think that at all. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 03:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)