Talk:The Truth About Nanjing

Reason to keep
This existence of this film project is well-sourced, and it is notable.--Daveswagon 05:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * speedy deletion tag will be removed. future film tag will replace it. thanks.--Tainter 06:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

As a chinese
As a true man of China, I feel sorry for you. This is Wikipedia, and the whole point is to tell the truth and discuss about it. Your message is completely irrelevent, and your opion will only make your countryman feel shame that we have such base cur in our nation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.31.161.11 (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

What happened in Nanking was not false propaganda. IT HAPPENED. Innocent Chinese men were used for the Japanese soldiers to practice their bayonet stabbings...women and young girls were violated by 3 or 4 Japanese men consecutively and left to bleed to death...the people of China in Nanking were imprisoned by the Japanese and abused and humiliated much like the Jewish during the Holocaust. The Japanese government has still not offered a formal apology to the Chinese, and writes textbooks that portray the Japanese as saviors of the Chinese during WWII. Japan is still in denial and everyone should be wary that the Japanese are trying to use "The Truth about Nanjing" to brainwash even more people. Be wise, educate yourself on this topic! Askforthetruth (talk) 06:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Askforthetruth


 * The Chinese accounts about Nanking/ Nanjing are taken from eyewitnesses & their families.
 * There’s a Japanese history/tradition of censorship about their war crimes & an industry of Holocaust deniers has proved profitable for many.
 * The problem lies in Japan, it’s pro-Japanese propaganda & it’s censorship laws, recently updated to include the crime of mentioning its censorship!
 * Evidence of Japanese pre-war massacres & subsequent Tokyo War Trials are now available in archives (except for Japan,of course) J9Peterson (talk) 10:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Please someone come up with a good link against the premise of this film or referenced data. We desperately need a Controversy section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.159.248.183 (talk) 12:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Find reliable sources that discuss the reaction. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphan Status?
I added links to this article on a couple relevant topics (the massacre itself, Sino-Japanese relations), but more could be helpful. Although, considering the surprising number of inter-Wiki links that exist, can this article still be considered an orphan? I'm tempted to say no, but I'll leave the tags on just in case. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 08:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

The orphan tag is irreleveant. I removed it. Yaki-gaijin (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Evidences?
The phrase “backed by overwhelming material evidence” is not neutral, since these “evidence” were proved to be fake…. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.78.115.124 (talk) 06:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * By whom? Sources? WhisperToMe (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Future tense
This article should be rewritten in the past tense. JoshuSasori (talk) 04:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)