Talk:The Unspoken King

Virus/spyware at one of the linked review sites?
I opened all the reviews linked to in this article, in separate tabs, and was going to read them. Upon doing so, my computer locked up, and I discovered that my desktop had been hijacked and that I had been infected with a malicious program called |"Antivirus XP 2008". I have no idea which site I got it from (since I opened all the sites at once), but I know it wasn't Allmusic.com. I don't really know how this stuff works, so maybe my computer had already been infected? I'm pretty sure I got it from one of those sites though. I just wanted to let the editors of this article know that there might be a security risk on one of the websites linked to in the review box. Sorry if this is a false alarm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.139.48.34 (talk) 07:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

There should be a new section
There should be a section that talks about Flo's response towards the criticism regarding their latest effort. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.130.11.86 (talk) 05:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Genre
Having both "Brutal Death Metal" and "Deathcore" as the genre is kinda hypocritical, it can't really be both, its Tech Death at best but majoriy of the work is deathcore/metalcore based (this being the famous album where the majority of reviewers and fan pan them for their style change.) I recommend a removal of Brutal Death Metal at the minimum. Tazz (talk) 20:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Canniba  loki  20:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes it absolutely can be both, what does that even mean, "Hypocritical"? Lmaaooooo try listening to bands like whoretopsy, Moker or ingested... or perhaps a new band called Bodybox; they all play that exact combination. so yea now that we know that brutal death/deathcore hybrids exist and totally are doable, i will now say that this album however is by no means brutal death, it's like a weird technical deathcore. 23.162.0.90 (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)