Talk:The Valley Library/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: RHM22 (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

No DAB links, external links look fine.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I would like to review your article. I learned quite a bit from reading it.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The article is short, but it seems to cover the topic thoroughly.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The facts seem to check out.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article seems thorough to me.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The images all seem to be tagged correctly.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Nice work!-RHM22 (talk) 16:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)