Talk:The Volunteer (book)

UNDUE
Flemming's review does not need a dedicated subsection, it is just one of many reviews available to us. Remember WP:UNDUE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC) :It is the only academic review here, probably the only one that should be included. It was not given a separate sub-section, it was placed in the existing Critica reception section. Writing something untrue does not make it true. Furthermore, the version that you restored contains untruthful statements about the review.--Bob not snob (talk) 04:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

The spectator
is not APLRS, and the content from there is factually incorrect. Pilecki's story was published already in Fighting Auschwitz, before 1989.--Bob not snob (talk) 04:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The source is being used for recent events (opening up of Soviet archives etc). You may think that it's "factually incorrect" but that's original research. The text you removed does not assert that this was the first time that Pilecki's story was published.  Volunteer Marek   05:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Author of the publication, i.e. Caroline Moorehead has published a lot of non-fiction and qualify as an expert. No, it is arguably consistent with APLRS. At least that is what I think. But I may be wrong because who knows what this sourcing restriction suppose to mean exactly. My very best wishes (talk) 15:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

My review of the book
I have published a review of the book in a RS journal here. Perhaps someone would like to use it to expand this article? It would be better than if I did so myself, per COI and like. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)