Talk:The War in 2020

It's perfectly ok. It describes it well CynicalMe, although you might want to introduce the concept it used of a computer feeling 'pain'? As that was, just one, of the many interesting concepts this guy introduced. So much better book than the two dimensionality of Tom Clancy's. Just shows you how square and unimaginative those 'military war games' really are. Reality has a way of showing those 'squares in a square hole' ideas that Clancy stood for wrong, over and over again.

90.130.218.192 (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Clean Up
THe article is in need of serious cleanup. It seems it is clipped and is not well organized. Only the template and book cover seem ok. --Cerejota 10:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a work in progress. Feel free to contribute...CynicalMe 23:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It still needs some serious work. 208.91.70.127 (talk) 18:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Please ad some notability, reception and critical appraisal (referenced) information if possible. :: Kevinalewis  :  (Talk Page) / (Desk)  09:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:War2020.jpg
Image:War2020.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Are you kidding?

'Fair use' of a book cover in this case should be considered free advertising, for the publisher. Don't see that as a problem? Neither will a publisher. As well as there is no cover existing any longer? Get that ridiculous warning away please.

90.130.218.192 (talk) 15:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)