Talk:The Watch (2012 film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miniapolis (talk · contribs) 16:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Over-citation?
In copyediting the article, I noticed four citations in a row for Ben Stiller's character in the "Cast" section. Per WP:OVERCITE, perhaps the least-valuable reference should be removed (I find more than three footnotes in a row to be clutter). All the best,  Miniapolis  ( talk ) 16:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look when you're finished copy editing, I don't want to cause you an edit conflict. I think the problem was each source carried a part of the info but not all, but I'll double check. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Done . Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: