Talk:The Way of All Flesh

[Untitled]
Did he "dare not publish it" or feel that its tone was "too contentious?" The article on the novel and the article on the author are at odds on this point.

Roy Harmon 18:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

The review link appears to be broken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.165.53.242 (talk) 15:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm reading through this plot summary, and it's wildly conversational and sensationalist. I'd clean it up myself, but I haven't read the book and wouldn't want to cut something important. Maybe another kind soul could, though? AdjectiveAnimal (talk) 18:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 22:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Purpose?
What is the function of saying that the book can be found in hardback and paperback? Isn't this a bit pedantic? And it also neglects digital copies online, audiobooks, etc. Moreover, what is the function of telling the page numbers of the book? It certainly doesn't agree with either copy of the novel I have. Even if it were true of one edition (even the first), what information is conveyed by including it? AnthroMimus (talk) 02:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)