Talk:The White Hell of Pitz Palu (1929 film)

Public domain
Is it somewhere on the internet? A link would be cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.103.44.153 (talk) 12:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Piz Palü in Inglourious Basterds
(The first two contributors to this section added their comments to the Piz Palü page, from where this has been copied. It seems, given the amount of reversions, that it is relevant here as well.) Ericoides (talk) 08:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * In an article that is only four paragraphs long, I personally feels that just one sentence mentioning the role of Piz Palü in Inglourious Basterds should be included. Wikipedia should be a place where one can find the most information about a subject as possible, and as Wikipedia doesn't have the space constraints of a paper-bound encyclopedia, adding one sentence of information wouldn't seem excessive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B.b.schellenberg (talk • contribs) 06:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no beef against a referenced and meaningful addition to this page. It's just that so far all the additions have been along the lines of "The White Hell of Pitz Palu is referenced in Inglourious Basterds by Quentin Tarantino." No reference, no detail as to what the mountain (as opposed to the Riefenstahl film) is up to in the film. Do we want to add to the Monet page the fact that the camera lingers on a painting by him on the cover of a book in an Ealing comedy, which the protagonists then chat about for a bit? Should we add this fact to the lily page as well? What kind of mention do you think is best, and does the Tarantino film refer to both the Riefenstahl film and the mountain. If it's just the film being referred to then Tarantino has no place on the mountain page. If you look at the recent history of the The White Hell of Pitz Palu you'll see that a number of editors have removed the same info from there as "unencyclopaedic". Ericoides (talk) 08:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Sneaking in a "References in pop culture" section under the guise of "Legacy" is underhanded, and probably doesn't do justice to the film's real legacy either. —Wegesrand (talk) 11:58, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Heading?
There's a sentence in the plot section about Hans being jealous because of "Hans awaking to find Krafft's under the heading a smiling Maria". I'd fix this sentence, but I don't know exactly what's trying to be said. Krafft's what? His head? Under the head of Maria? I get the general idea, but I haven't seen the movie, so I don't know exactly what is shown. Can someone fix this sentence?Wood Monkey 07:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neurodog (talk • contribs)