Talk:The Woman I've Become (EP)

Requested move 5 September 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 04:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

The Woman I've Become (EP) → The Woman I've Become – WP:PRIMARY. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 01:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Is it really the primary article? This EP didn't chart anywhere, but the album of the same name reached no. 2 in Sweden and has been certified gold there. I don't think we can be certain this is the primary topic simply because non-internet content in Swedish from 2006 isn't easy to find. Richard3120 (talk) 01:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Albums has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE  15:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Note - the proposal in its current state is aiming to overwrite the existing dab page. If you reply and would like something else to be done with the dab, please specify what. (Dab can probably be deleted if this is supported, unless somebody adds something new before this closes) ASUKITE 15:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose: as Richard said, there's not a clear-cut primary topic between these two. Unless there's already been a thorough WP:BEFORE search for The Woman I've Become (album) coverage that turned up nothing, in which case that article should be deleted and then the dab would be unnecessary/replaceable with a hatnote. That search needs to be done first before this move can be justified. QuietHere (talk) 16:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose: having done some research, the Jill Johnson album has certainly been reviewed in the Swedish press: in the two major dailies Svenska Dagbladet and Dagens Nyheter (behind a paywall), as well as shorter reviews in the evening papers Expressen  and Aftonbladet . The fact that all of these are reliable independent sources, whereas the sources for this EP are either primary interviews with Jessie James Decker, simple release announcements, or sources of dubious reliability, plus the fact that Jill Johnson's album charted highly and received a gold certification, makes me edge towards saying that if anything should be the primary article, it's the album, not the EP. But I still believe there is no primary article, and the dab page and these two articles should remain as they are. Richard3120 (talk) 19:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)