Talk:The Woolpack

Fair use rationale for Image:Woolpack.jpg
Image:Woolpack.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Malt Shoval
What happened to it? JMRH6 (talk) 00:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Second Oldest Pub?
Is this true as the dates for the pub openings seem inaccurate, The Rovers and The Vic were Opened in the 1900's and not the 60's and 80's as stated and I'm sure the original Woolpack wouldn't have opened on the day that Emmerdale started, maybe the wording needs to be changed slightly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.115.223 (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

zero sources
According to WP policy, once uncited material is removed, it may not be re-added without providing valid refs from independent, reliable sources. This is as per WP:BURDEN. Continued re-adding of uncited material is disruptive editing, and the choice as per WP:DDE, but to report the editor to ANI. Which is not pleasant for anyone involved. Perhaps rather than wasting time, editors might find references for the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah was just going through the weekly draftification report when I found this mess, sorry to have thrown my hat in the ring. Curbon7 (talk) 01:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)