Talk:The Working Hour

Untitled
I am improving the reference quality and adding sources/instances to verify notability.CptMcKrowsky (talk) 19:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Questionable notability.
The original request for speedy deletion for this article was probably a good one, but the article's creator has subsequently added enough material so that it now makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7 of criteria for speedy deletion. I am not, however, convinced that the article is notable under WP:Notability (music). I have no strong opinion on the subject at this time, but the issue can be raised at the WP:Articles for deletion page if necessary. I would encourage the author to add material that would evidence notability. In particular, the article needs some third party reliable sources. If there are none, then the band is probably non-notable. All it should take, basically, is a review or significant discussion of the band in a newspaper, or something like that. CO GDEN  20:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

--Edited page to show "review or significant discussion of the band in a newspaper, or something like that." CptMcKrowsky (talk) 20:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks good. I think the band's sufficient notability is clear, based on what's now in the article. CO GDEN  04:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on The Working Hour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061107185359/http://www.itunes.com/ to http://www.itunes.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)