Talk:The Writing's on the Wall/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs)) 19:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

I told you I would review this one, let's go! --K. Peake 19:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * Infobox looks good!
 * Merge the first para with the second para
 * "Lyrically, The Writing's on the Wall is constructed" → "Lyrically, the album is constructed"
 * Change the part about the two number one singles to starting with, "Two US Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles were produced" since the title is being overused in this para
 * "have listed The Writing's on the Wall" → "have listed the album"

Background and development

 * "who became the group's manager." → "who became their manager."
 * Second para looks good!

Recording and production

 * Quote box looks good!
 * "them into songs suitable for them." → "them into suitable songs."
 * Only use Whites' surname as she was identified in full previously
 * "to executive producer alongside Destiny's Child's manager Mathew Knowles," → "to executive producer alongside Mathew Knowles," as he was introduced earlier and keeping as is per MOS:SAMESURNAME
 * "a new mix to Mathew Knowles," → "a new mix to Knowles,"
 * "at The Hit Factory in New York City" → "at The Hit Factory in New York City (NYC)"
 * D'wayne Wiggins → D'Wayne Wiggins

Music and lyrics

 * Img and second para look good!
 * "the tone for the album" → "the tone for The Writing's on the Wall"

Title and packaging

 * Good

Release and promotion

 * Img and second para look good!
 * "on April 24 further" → "on April 24, further"

Singles

 * First para looks good!
 * [59][51][60][61][53] should be moved around to be next to the countries since it is too many cluttered

Critical reception

 * First para looks good!
 * Consequence commentary should be last for thematic order

Listings

 * Good

Awards and nominations

 * Remove the link for the 2000 Soul Train awards

Commercial performance

 * "the album registered a" → "The Writing's on the Wall registered a"
 * "In total, it spent" → "In total, The Writing's on the Wall spent"

Controversy

 * Img looks good!
 * Remove pipe on Monica
 * "On March 15," → "On March 15, 2000"
 * Second para looks good!

Impact and legacy

 * First para and img looks good!
 * "the group and Mathew Knowles." → "the group and Knowles."
 * Beyoncé should not be wikilinked
 * Wikilink The Guardian

Track listing

 * Good

Personnel

 * Good

Charts

 * Good

Certifications

 * Good

Release history

 * Good

Final comments and verdict

 * until all of the issues are fixed; that went very fast! --K. Peake 21:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I have one question: why should New York City be accompanied by its abbreviation? Bronx Langford (talk) 18:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello sorry for the late reply - I forgot to note that while it should have its abbreviation on the first instance, then stylize it as NYC only on the second instance for better flow. K. Peake 20:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Alright. Other than that, is everything good? Bronx Langford (talk) 22:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It is quite moderate, but the Copyvio score is still above 40% so please cut down quoting. --K. Peake 16:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I've cut down as much quoting as I can. Is the Copyvio score acceptable now? Bronx Langford (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ? ―  VAUGHAN J.   (t · c) 07:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ now, sorry I took two days for this one! --K. Peake 11:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Bronx Langford (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)