Talk:The Wrong Guys: Murder, False Confessions, and the Norfolk Four

Hmm...
I'm thinking I might contest this since there are a few reviews out there, along with an article in the New Yorker. The reviews are pretty much trade reviews, but there hasn't been any official consensus over whether or not trade reviews shouldn't be counted, so technically they still count towards notability at this point in time. What's sort of tipping the scale slightly is that it looks to have been used as a point of discussion in this book, which was released by NYU Press. It's just slightly enough to give a reasonable enough doubt that I'd recommend taking it to AfD to get a wider discussion. If I remove the PROD from this page, this will pretty much be the reason why. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Then again, I might just clean up the page for the NF and redirect this to a small subsection of that article. I'm not entirely sold on the idea that this needs an independent article at this point in time.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I've redirected this to Norfolk_Four, as I just don't think that there is enough to merit a separate article right now. There are two trade reviews and one article that's predominantly about the case itself rather than the book. Given that the article for the Norfolk Four needs further work and to be fleshed out and that this article would be little more than a restating of the case, it's just better that this redirect there. Sometimes it's better to have one article than several that repeat the same thing ad nauseum. I'm willing to debate it if anyone can show that this has received more coverage, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)