Talk:The X-Files (film)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SuperMarioMan (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I notice that this an old review request - to help the project, I am starting this process now. This is my first Good Article nominee review, so I will probably seek the advice of a mentor before this article's status is finalised. I will try to present my findings without too much delay, and from there any alterations that I deem necessary can be effected or discussed. SuperMarioMan (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * As no improvements have been made by the nominator to the article, I suggest that it be failed. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 14:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm failing the article as a GA, since the reviewer's comments were not addressed. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 17:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)