Talk:The X-Files (film)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I disambiguation fixed.diff

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The artcile is reasonably well written, and complies sufficiently with the MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Refernces to reliable sources, check out ans upport cited statements.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused): {{GAList/check|y
 * The article sufficiently covers the subject, without going into un-necessary detail.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Two images used, correctly tagg and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this is good to go. I will list this as a good article. Areas for future development if you wish to go to FAC:  A wider range of sources needed, prose could be improved to flow better.Perhaps a little more about world-wide reception. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this is good to go. I will list this as a good article. Areas for future development if you wish to go to FAC:  A wider range of sources needed, prose could be improved to flow better.Perhaps a little more about world-wide reception. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)