Talk:The Zoological Record

Coverage
On 3 December 2009 Clifflandis replaced the history of the coverage of phyla in The Zoological Record with the 2007 phyla listing, which is quite different. The historical listing gave a sense of the growth of science, while the 2007 listing is merely a snapshot, and is replicative of the material in the article Phylum. Between the two, I would favor putting Coverage as a subset of the History section. --Bejnar (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Bejnar. The Bridson article lists some of the development dates of the ZR's sections, but they are presented in a rather confusing format (and only up to 1968).  I can go back and put in the historical phyla titles, but I'll need to brainstorm a better way of presenting the information so that it is easily understood and so that it doesn't take up too much space.  I just got some more articles on the history of the ZR through interlibrary loan, so I should be able to update the content in the next few days. -- Clifflandis (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Zoological Record. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100312012635/http://www.iczn.org/BZNMar2003general_articles.htm to http://www.iczn.org/BZNMar2003general_articles.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)