Talk:Theje/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 21:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

After reviewing a good number of your Eurovision contest articles, here is a song review! --K. Peake 21:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * Rather than having the ref for the English title in the infobox, you should source it in a relevant area of the body
 * I've placed that part in the beginning of the Composition and reception section Iaof2017 (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The release sentence should be swapped with writing/production for the correct order
 * ""Theje" is an" → "The song is an"
 * Pipe ballad to Sentimental ballad
 * The critical reception sentence should come directly before the lyric video
 * "as well as on Ramosaj's" → "as well as Ramosaj's"
 * Wikilink black and white
 * Pipe LED screen to LED display

Background and release

 * "stated that he intends to participate" → "revealed his intention to participate"
 * Remove commas around Radio Televizioni Shqiptar (RTSH)
 * Remove "of "Theje"" after the digital release part, as the term accompanying is already used

Composition and reception

 * "as well as the production" → "as well as the production done"
 * "and delve on a" → "and delves into a"
 * "he forgive and continue" → "he forgave and continued"
 * "received generally positive reviews" → "was met with generally positive reviews" but only critics appear to be sourced, not fans
 * "In a review of ESCUnited" → "In a review for ESCUnited"
 * "writer William found it building in" → "writer William saw as building in"
 * "two following "epic" chorus'" → "two following "epic" choruses"

Festival i Këngës

 * Remove introduction to RTSH because you have already done this previously
 * "Although during his shows, Ramosaj's performance commences" → "During his shows, Ramosaj's performance commenced"
 * Wikilink black and white
 * "and eventually progresses" → "and eventually progressed" but where does the source actually mention this part?
 * I removed that part and merged it with the following portion . Iaof2017 (talk) 12:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Dark imagery is not sourced
 * Pipe LED walls to LED display
 * "regarded by media" → "regarded by the media"
 * [18][19][20][21][22] is too many citations at the end of one sentence, so move them around to relevant parts (preferably after punctuation)

Personnel

 * Good

Track listing

 * Good

Release history

 * Format → Format(s)

Final comments and verdict

 * until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 08:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi hope you're good. I've solved your comments above with two notes by me. Greetings to you! Iaof2017 (talk) 12:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ now, fantastic work once again! --K. Peake 22:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. :D Iaof2017 (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)