Talk:Themes in Avatar/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Will review, starting tomorrow. Pyrotec (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * I've have a quick couple of skim-read throughs. At this stage the article appears to be comprehensive and well referenced. As such, I would expect it to make GA-status this time round. However, this is not the final decision; and I'm now starting a detailed review.


 * It's worth noting that at this point in the review I will mostly listing "problems", so this part is possibly somewhat negative, but by the end of the review all points will have been covered. Pyrotec (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Looks well on its way to becoming FA to me... Dr. Blofeld       White cat 11:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

A very readable article at or beyond GA-level. I'm therefore awarding GA-status. Congratulations on producing a fine article. P.S. I must get the DVD from Amazon.

I tend to agree with Dr. Blofeld, its well on its way to being an WP:FAC. FAC is tough, but I do suggest that you submit it when you're are ready to WP:PR. Pyrotec (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I see you've already done PR. Pyrotec (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)