Talk:Theo Vennemann

No secondary sources
WP requires secondary sources in order for the text to be reliable. Some secondary comments about these very bold theories would be profitable for all. I'll mark the article accordingly. Rursus dixit. ( m bork3 !) 10:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Punic is not correct
V. does not say, that Punians and Carthagians settled northern Europe. This settlement, leading to the megalithic culture, took place 4000 BC, Punians were at most reported 1000 BC, if not 400 BC. Read Baldi & Page, they give a correct short version of V. theories, although being critical.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Theo Vennemann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cls.psu.edu/pubs/pubs/LINGUA1158.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719080808/http://www.rotary-muenchen.de/2005-2006/theo-vennemann.pdf to http://www.rotary-muenchen.de/2005-2006/theo-vennemann.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100505004454/http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~vennemann/ to http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~vennemann/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Difficult to understand !
So his theories include a criticism? Written by some Baldi and Page ? Or by him ? Or are his theories not by him, but by Baldi and Page ? That is difficult to understand. It's the first theory I have heard of which starts with a criticism of itself. 159.192.238.75 (talk) 14:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)