Talk:Theodore Lukens

Assessment comments
Per request at WikiProject Biography/Assessment, I'm leaving a few comments here on how I think that this can become B-Class.
 * 1) Quotations should be embedded in paragraphs unless they are three lines or longer.
 * 2) There should be some more references... some paragraphs have no citations at all.
 * 3) There are a lot of short paragraphs which should probably be combined for flow.
 * 4) There are two types of references... shortened footnotes and full footnotes. Using only one or the other would probably be good.

-Drilnoth (talk) 02:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Rewritten version-May 8, 2009
I have put a great deal of effort and have suffered a great deal of abuse from my editor/husband to write this new version of this biography on Lukens. The old version is available from the page history list, to compare differences. I hope that the other editors agree that this is a much better story, both in layout and content. Enjoy! Marcia Wright (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Reassessment comments
Hekerui (talk) 09:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The lead of this article contains too many paragraphs, please condense. - Done 8-5-09-MW
 * Please add Persondata - Done 8-5-09 -MW
 * The section "Conservationist" could use some more wikilinks - Done 8-5-09 -MW
 * The article still has short paragraphs which should be combined for flow.- Under discussion, mw

Helen Lukens
Why is Helen Lukens or rather Helen Lukens Jones not a separate article? She is Theodore Lukens' daughter but she published work in her own name. It made finding information on her a bit more difficult. X13007 (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)