Talk:Theories of taxation

Start
i have started a new piece specially devoted to taxation theory as the existing page doesn't enlist the adequate and exact details. do let me know if it's ok and i have a go-ahead after having gone through the jist here.Ari.MSC (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Osiris (talk) 16:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC) Osiris (talk) 16:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Theory or theories
having looked at this article, perhaps you were right to propose renaming Category:Theory of taxation to "Theories", and this page should be renamed to "Theories of taxation". If you agree, I suggest a bold move of the page. – Fayenatic  L ondon 12:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. However, the rationale for the category move was invalid as you noted before, since the category does not contain a set of theories, rather a set of terms that are each more or less related to (a) theory. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Graphs
Point O is not labelled on Lindahl graph. Point A is not labelled on Bowen graph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.144.84.231 (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

India Education Program course assignment
This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Inappropriate quote attribution.
The entire quote attributed to Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations is a lie.

The quote is actually from the anonymous authors of this random blog: https://indsysres.wordpress.com/the-wealth-of-nations-a-translation-into-modern-english/ WraithKenny (talk) 17:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)