Talk:Theory of War

Not an assessment, balanced or otherwise
This is about the laziest, most unhelpful 'article' I have come across, largely dependent on what can be gathered from the covers of the novel. Other claims are made in references for which the links have long ceased to function and may well be commercially suspect puffery. A little basic punctuation would not come amiss either. I'll put it on my watch list and if it does not improve within a reasonable time, it seems a good candidate for deletion. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 00:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi just seen the above, sorry for my laziness and unhelpfulness, will try and move stuff from the Joan Brady article to this one... GrahamHardy (talk) 05:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I have moved stuff from the authors article but I still feel a bit peeved by being 'lazy' and 'unhelpful'... GrahamHardy (talk) 18:29, 8 October 2022

The description is of the article, not its editor. But the major discrepancy in punctuation after the editor's latest intrusion seems to prove the point! Sweetpool50 (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)