Talk:There's More Than One of Everything/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Matthew RD 19:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I shall conduct this review. -- Matthew RD 19:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

This is how the article fairs against the GA criteria
 * 1) Well written: See notes below
 * 2) Factually accurate and verifiable: Passed
 * 3) Broad in coverage: Plot a but too long, but it is confusing so I'll let you off the hook. Passed
 * 4) Neutral: Passed
 * 5) Stable: Passed, yes
 * 6) Images: Passed? See notes below

OK everything checks out fine, apart from these few irks;


 * The infobox image; the tags check out fine, but it looks of shoddy quality (as if someone took a picture of it from a camera in front of the TV screen, so I'm not sure if that would be the best image, or maybe move back to the first one and make it smaller)
 * "is the twentieth episode and season finale of the first season", best to say just season one finale or first season finale.
 * "was watched by more than 9.28 million viewers." Seems quite a specific number for more than (unless it was 9.2 or just nine), so say just 9.28.
 * "As Bell as been communicating these past few months "strictly electronically"." I take it you mean Bell "has" been communicating.
 * Isn't disk supposed to be spelled with a "c" instead?

Also, I must apologise that I currently have a shitty internet connection (works fine for a little while then halts suddenly for potentially hours at a time) so if I don’t respond to your responses quickly enough, then that would probably be the cause. -- Matthew RD 00:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. I edited accordingly to most of your suggestions, and tried to upload an image with less of a blur (not sure if it's an improvement or not). Thanks, Ruby2010   talk  01:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * There's_More_Than_One_of_Everything has no citations. It should really be cited before it gets passed on that. "but did not receive any nominations." is also not cited. --LauraHale (talk) 01:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Plots do not need citations, per WP:TVPLOT, which states;
 * "Plot summaries do not normally require citations; the television show itself is the source, as the accuracy of the plot description can be verified by watching the episode in question." -- Matthew RD 01:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I added a citation for the lack of emmy nominations. Also, I was about to cite WP:TVPLOT myself. Thanks Matthew :) Ruby2010   talk  01:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll pass it, good job. Also, seems like my Internet's back. -- Matthew RD 01:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)