Talk:Theta Pavonis

Orphaned references in Theta Pavonis
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Theta Pavonis's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "SIMBAD": From NU Pavonis: SIMBAD, NU Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)  From Nu Pavonis: SIMBAD, Nu Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)  From Lambda Pavonis: SIMBAD, Lambda Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)  From Kappa Pavonis: SIMBAD, Kappa Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)  From Beta Pavonis: SIMBAD, Beta Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)  From Zeta Pavonis: SIMBAD, Zeta Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)  From Rho Pavonis: SIMBAD, Rho Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013)  From Stellar classification: </li> <li>From Pi Pavonis: SIMBAD, HR 6745 (accessed 6 January 2013) </li> <li>From Alpha Pavonis: </li> <li>From Delta Pavonis: </li> <li>From Eta Pavonis: SIMBAD, Eta Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013) </li> <li>From Epsilon Pavonis: SIMBAD, Epsilon Pavonis (accessed 6 January 2013)</li> <li>From Xi Pavonis: SIMBAD, Xi Pavonis (accessed 10 January 2013) </li> <li>From Phi1 Pavonis: SIMBAD, HR 7848 (accessed 10 January 2013)</li> </ul>

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)