Talk:Thieves and Kings

Notability
I believe this series does have sufficient notability to warrant its own article. I have therefore removed the PD template. I also added a link to a critical review to help substantiate this assertion.

IMO, "Thieves & Kings" has just as much, if not more, notability as random hamlets with populations in the 1000 range - a subject which Wikipedia is substantially supplied with. Comments? DeMatt (talk) 08:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * What's the proof of sufficient notability? I see you asserting that it warrants it, but I don't know how that proves anything. Has this won awards? Influenced other books? Been reviewed more than once? I'd like to see a little more justification than one review. --Kynn (talk) 02:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Contested prods should never be restored for any reason. Besides, the Curled Up source satisfies WP:N. -- Explodicle (T/C) 14:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)