Talk:Thillana Mohanambal/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 08:33, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: I have added a footnote about the Nadaswaram. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC) @Dr. Blofeld: Earlier, it was Tiruvarur, but I guessed someone might have moved the page. So, I have done it as you suggested. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC) @Dr. Blofeld: I have done as you suggested. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC) @Dr. Blofeld: I have re-written the sentence as "to marry a wealthy man so that she can settle down in life properly" Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:40, 4 December 2014 (UTC) @Dr. Blofeld: Thamizhisai Sangam is where music and dance is performed. It is a general name for auditoriums and other places where music and dance are perfomed. But I have re-written the line. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Lead
 * Can you add (a wind instrument) after Nadaswaram for our non Tamil readers.
 * Correct link to Thiruvarur and in the article body
 * "songs like "Nalandhana", "Maraindhirundhu" and "Pandian Naanirukka" remain popular today." In Tamil Nadu I gather, or southern India? Certainly not on a wider scale. Perhaps add in ...
 * Plot
 * "to marry a rich man so that she can be richly" -Avoid repetition of rich
 * What is " Thamizhisai Sangam"?
 * You don't need to keep pinging me, I have the review open on another tab!♦ Dr. Blofeld  09:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. Thank you for mentioning it. :) Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Re-written it with a capital letter and in italics this time. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Linked Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Re-written the sentence. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Linked "Sikkal". I have written that "Sikkal" means tendency to get into trouble. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Added Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Production
 * "a nadaswaram" -no capital letter this time?
 * Link Padmini in casting.
 * "Her character, Mohanambal, vied with Ganesan's character professionally, even though they fell in love in the film" -doesn't really make sense.
 * "e suffix "Sikkal" due to his sensitive nature and tendency to get irritated" -makes no sense to non Tamil speakers, add a note on its Tamil meaning or something
 * "Ganesan attended Carnatic music concerts,and" -add space after comma

Re-written as "Ganesan did not have a playback singer for any of the songs in the film." Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Given. Note d. Also added a reference book source. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Re-written as "had" for one of the repeated words. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Corrected Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Paraphrased. Tell me where I should paraphrase more please. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Music
 * Can you reword "None of the songs in the film had a singer for Ganesan because it focuses on music and dance."
 * sangati '​s ?? note?
 * Reception
 * Repetition of "completed"
 * "The Tamil magazime" -typo
 * Some of the quotes are really superfluous. I think you should paraphrase a few like I did with the actor quotes to improve flow and readability.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Accolades
 * I think all those quotes here can be either in reception or legacy. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:49, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I moved them even before I read this here!♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

The heading of the article was in caps lock, so i wrote it as per written in the source. You want me to change it? Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * References
 * Does ref 60 title really need to be in cap locks?♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Changed Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Thanks for addressing the points. The prose is still a little choppy, I think it still needs a good copyedit to avoid short sentences and repetition but it seems to have the bulk of what is required. Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)