Talk:Thin Man (nuclear bomb)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 21:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Why did Oppenheimer believe that sabots would be needed by the Thin Man design?
 * ✅ High muzzle velocities required by critical assembly. Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Were the 20 mm Oerlikon and 3-inch guns used as scale models?
 * ✅ Yes. Made this more explicit. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hyphenate 3-inch gun as a compound adjective. And the sizes of the weapon: 38 inches (97 cm) wide tail and nose assemblies, and a 23 inches (58 cm) midsection
 * ✅ Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Put quotes around Thin Man only on first use.
 * ✅ Already is, in the lead and the third paragraph of the first section. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * And in the first para of the specifications section. But I'm not going to hold up promotion over this trivial issue.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * What were the glider mechanisms used for?
 * ✅ Suspending the bomb in the bomb bay. Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Fix punctuation here: when James Conant heard on 14 November via Wallace Akers the director of the British Tube Alloys project,
 * ✅ Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Photos appropriately licensed.
 * No Dabs, overlinks, or external links.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)