Talk:Things as They Are; or, The Adventures of Caleb Williams

-- this page isnt great. for such a great book.. its surprising for a book taught at university level that this has gone amiss. the current article on it also is in need of editing. I would rather someone that has read it more than me do that.

Spanish Version
I think its funny that an English-language book has a more complete Spanish version article than it does on the English wikipedia. Anyway, I'm reading this book for a class and would be glad to expand it after I'm done reading. --24.16.126.252 (talk) 22:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Reviews of Caleb Williams
An earlier, badly written version of this page attempted to provide a survey of critical views and historical contexts.--82.47.18.144 (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was summarily deleted without discussion, but I have restored it now. I realise that the policies on verifiability and original research are important, but it would be nice if we could try to see how much it is possible to improve the content, rather than just deleting the entire section. Celuici (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm assuming what I'm seeing now is part of the badly written version of the page mentioned above? Because ... is it just me, or is there nothing "immensely flattering" about this "description of Godwin and his writing of Caleb Williams": “he was in the very zenith of a sultry and unwholesome popularity; he blazed as a sun in the firmament of reputation; no one was more talked of, more looked up to, more sought after, and wherever liberty, truth, justice was the theme, his name was not far off—now he has sunk below the horizon, and enjoyed the serene twilight of a doubtful immortality"? The tone feels slyly condescending, unless William Hazlitt's using the words "unwholesome" and "doubtful" idiomatically in a way I don't think people would today (in a reverential context, for example). —Maxisdetermined (talk) 01:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)