Talk:Think and Grow Rich

The article doesn't address the various controversies around the books' origins
There is a lot of controversy around Hill's life, work, and book.

For example, there is a reasonable argument that he did not actually interview the people he claimed he did. https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/12/the-untold-story-of-napoleon-hill-the-greatest-self-help-scammer-of-all-time/

To simply present (a very abridged version of) the content and not to put it in context is, I think, misleading.

I personally feel that the content (ideas) in the book are fine, but there are huge question marks over whether Hill actually was who he said he was, and if he did what he said he did. I think most likely not. The article should address this squarely.

Lauchlanmack (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Are we supposed to accept gizmodo as an authority? Is it a credible source? Looking through it one finds very few references or citations that one could look up to verify what they have stated.24.139.24.163 (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * What alternatives are you offering? --Hipal (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Think and Grow Rich
Index 103.58.155.229 (talk) 10:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)