Talk:Thinking Putty

Apparently this page had already been on VfD once, and was voted to keep (by 3 people, one of whom was probably a sockpuppet). This makes no sense. The page should be merged with Silly Putty and deleted. I wiped out the "external links", both of which were to vendors. This page can only be an ad, and since "thinking putty" is just another brand of silly putty, it should be discussed on that page. Jeeves 1 July 2005 23:33 (UTC)

I agree this page needs to be merged with Silly Putty. For now, I've cleaned it up a bit, but would rather see it as a footnote on the Silly Putty page. They're the exact same base compound... --Rehcsif 03:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This page has had a 'merge' tag on it far too long, with almost no discussion. I'm going to be WP:BOLD and suggest that after July 5, 2006 (about a week from now) if there are no serious objections, that any relavant info from this page be moved to Silly Putty and this page turned into a redirect.  Please discuss at Talk:Silly Putty --Rehcsif 21:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

I beg to differ as based on the faulty logic above we would simply ignore the impact on the word of a google since it is simply another variation of Yahoo but does the same thing????

I am really curious what is truly driving the two posts above to ignore Crazy Aaron's putty??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.164.79.109 (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Not every product/service on Earth is deserving of a separate Wikipedia article. See Notability for more information.

204.246.5.67 (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)