Talk:Thirty Flights of Loving/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 06:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Hah, I also reviewed Gravity Bone! Wasn't expecting to review this, but when I was it was the sequel, I had to. All in all pretty decent! Lemme know when you take care of these, and I'll be happy to pass. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 06:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the "and released in July 2012" part of the first sentence should be moved elsewhere. It makes the opening sentence a bit too long
 * Done.
 * "and offered alongside a free copy of Gravity Bone. Thirty Flights of Loving" - the way this reads right now has both Gravity Bone and Thirty... in italics. This is pretty random, but is there a way you could reword it so both titles aren't right next to each other?
 * Changed Gravity Bone to "it's predecessor"
 * "scoring 88 out of 100 at aggregate website Metacritic" - "at" --> "on"?
 * Fixed.
 * Didn't the protagonist die in Gravity Bone? Is this a prequel of sorts? Is it actually confirmed they are one in the same?
 * This game is not a direct sequel to Gravity Bone, story-wise. It just happens to be in the same universe and the same main protagonist. Yes, it is confirmed and it is spelled in the article ;)
 * "an unnamed spy who is taking part in an alcohol smuggling operation alongside non-playable characters Anita, a demolitions expert, and Borges, a forger." - this is a bit long, and it'd be great if it could be split up somehow.
 * Cut it into two. Please check.
 * What does the title mean?
 * No idea, the developer did not provide an answer to that :/
 * How much did the game cost?
 * As an indie game, it is rarely revealed how much these games cost. As Brendon developed the game himself, I assume the cost might be close to $0, but its my original research :)
 * Source for the Windows release date? The article just says July 2012.
 * Hmmm, fixed. Afaik, there is no exact date.
 * "and follows hacker overseeing one or more adept agents that have missions to infiltrate buildings and steal documents" - once again, this would be better split off. And... grammar
 * Fixed too!
 * Thanks! Hurricanehink :D — ΛΧΣ  21  Call me Hahc21 15:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)