Talk:Thirumurugan Gandhi

Vandalism on Name
RSS/BJP goons frequently edit the name as Daniel Gandhi to portray Mr. Thirumurugan Gandhi as Christian which is baseless propaganda for May 17 Movement, the movement he belongs, exposed BJP government's anti-people policies such as signing WTO agreement to destroy PDS system, demonetization is to force move people in cashless and bring common man in tax system, terming methane extraction as hydrocarbon project, Jallikattu issues and many more. Vandalism on the name must be stopped or must provide credible citation.

And again the vandalism continues. On 15th June 2017, users Srisoftram and Bullabong made 3 changes by changing the name. Reverted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.65.209.34 (talk) 10:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2017
Line 1: Thirumurugan Gandhi is a Tamil Nadu-based Tamil secessionist Please remove the word: secessionist Please change to : Thirumurugan Gandhi is a Tamil Nadu based Tamil activist Tamilpolitical (talk) 19:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sparkling Pessimist   Scream at me!  19:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Source 1: News about his unlawful arrest http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/political-leaders-film-industry-slam-govt-for-arrest-of-may-17-activists/articleshow/58917403.cms Source 2: Thirumurugan Gandhi spoke in United Nations https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFqh-BhkZAg Source 3: UNHRC members condemns his arrest https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZMZT-QIUe0
 * Pictogram voting comment.svg Note: This article is no longer Semi-Protected, so you can now edit the article yourself, but please ensure that any additions are properly sourced, to reliable sources and you maintain a neutral point of view - Arjayay (talk) 08:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

POV issues
There have been different descriptions of his occupation in the article: "activist" was replaced with "seccessionist" (diff), then "social reformer" (diff), which was then put in scare quotes by an editor who also added "separatist" (diff). None of the cited sources that I checked call him a "seccessionist" or "separatist". The closest is perhaps this source, but calling him a separatist by citing this article would in my opinion constitute original research. I will change the word back to "activist", which is the most neutral of the alternatives and the one which is most often used on the cited sources. Please bring discussion of the matter here. Kbseah (talk) 09:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Why was this page protected
This page was not cited adequately; and was protected, Why? Administerial action needed. - Paniyan Pandiyan (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)