Talk:This Book Loves You

Is this book really from Pewdiepie?
In a YouTube video on March 29th 2019, named "GOOGLING MYSELF!! MY NET WORTH", Pewdiepie seems to discover this book, saysing "Apparently I made a graphic novel in 2017. I wasn't aware of this." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfpsly (talk • contribs) 19:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Other languages
I believe that this book has been printed in numerous other languages other than English, including, but not limited to: Norwegian (https://www.aschehoug.no/nettbutikk/denne-boka-elsker-deg-aco.html) German (http://www.amazon.de/Dieses-Buch-liebt-dich-PewDiePie/dp/3499631555)

The above links have been taken from the description of a video released by PewDiePie promoting the book through youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqCvyvXc-U4

The reason that led to me believing the above statement is that the links redirect to pages in which altered covers of the book in languages other than English are visible.

I'm not sure if > it's only the covers that are in other languages; or > if the websites intentionally are showing their own covers that don't accurately represent the original book; or > there are numerous language versions of the book.

If no reliable source has been found to prove that the book was released in numerous languages, in the time of a few days, please edit the article to remove my claims accounting to that. Thank you.Rollingcontributor (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Comment from old talk
I believe this needs its own article - there is enough information on the subject to create an informative page

Apologies for blanking the page previously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwaggySlinky (talk • contribs) 11:04, 6 November 2015

Reception
I removed the content that referenced e-commerce sites and Goodreads. The problem with adding in this information is that anyone can add a review to these outlets, which makes it easy to sway the ratings in one way or another. This doesn't mean that the reviews for the books aren't genuine, but this fact does mean that sites of this nature will not be seen as reliable per Wikipedia's guidelines for RS. Also, e-commerce sites are almost never seen as appropriate sources of any type, as the sites are inherently promotional since they're there to sell you something and by extension, can make an article seem promotional or biased. Generally speaking, the only time e-commerce or social media-type site ratings can or should be mentioned is when they're the focus of quite a bit of coverage, like in the case of Bend, Not Break or Saving Christmas. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Tokyogirl79, I am a fairly new user and am susceptible to making many mistakes currently! I am thankful to you for letting me know some guidelines, and editing the article to reflect them. Once again, Thank you! Rollingcontributor (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)