Talk:This England (album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Albacore (talk · contribs) 19:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I will review this article shortly. Albacore (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * No DAB links, according to our tool a few links will go dead in the future, so it might be worth wile to archive them. Outside of the GA criteria, of course.
 * I am not sure how to archive links. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * File:This England, Oregon Symphony.jpg says it needs a FUR. I don't know if that applies to this article, but it is worth checking out. The other three files are OK, but it's odd that only the right-most file of the three is clickable.
 * So something needs to be added that does not already exist within the "Non-free media information and use rationale" summary? I have been editing WP for years and I still don't fully understand FUR and image upload requirements! Happy to make any required changes if provided more specificity... -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I added the link3 parameter to the template so that not only the third image is clickable. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The lead seems wordy and runs on in spots, can you split or simplify some of the sentences?
 * I split one of the sentences into two. Better? -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Can you link "interlude"?
 * To what? Interlude itself is a disambiguation page. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The Portland Mercury invited people from the city's music scene to list "Portland's Top Five Records of 2012"; the reviewer known as "Angry Symphony Guy" (Brian Horay)[26] included This England at the top of his list. what is meant by "music scene"? Seems idiomatic to me.
 * Good point. Now reads: "The Portland Mercury invited local music industry professionals to list..." -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Otherwise, the article seems very well-written and easily passes the GA criteria. Albacore (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking time to review this article. Happy to address any additional concerns you may have. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass. Albacore (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC)