Talk:This England (magazine)

Fair use rationale for Image:This England cover.jpg
Image:This England cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

The summary of This England makes it sound like a reactionary political journal. This is far from the truth. It may be nostalgic, and cater mostly for older English and Anglophiles, but it isn't a political magazine.124.197.15.138 (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Politics
The consents section implies that the magazine is largely political. That is not so. I have most copies from the second edition in 1968 to 2010 - inherited from my mother. Most articles are on history, architecture, royalty, village life, poetry, music and so on. Perhaps 1% could be seen as political, and that only indirectly. It is not and never has been a political magazine. Reference to the new owners having "subdued the magazine's political content" is wrong. The content of the magazine remains essentially unchanged.101.98.175.68 (talk) 20:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)