Talk:This Is the Moment

ok, wow, there seems to be a massive problem here, maybe even evidence of plagiarism on broadway. The Lady in Ermine features this very song (with only two lines that had slightly different lyrics). It's impossible for the credited writers of the new Jekyll and Hyde movie to have written this song, because the Lady in Ermine was a 1948 movie. There is no way in hell the credited songwriters traveled back in time to before 1/2 of the team was born (the other half was only 17 years old) to write this song. I just listened to both songs, and the instrumentals and keys are nearly identical. (small correction), while there are some differences, there's a great deal (keys, cords, crescendo application) that are identical. There's far too much "borrowed" from the 1948 song than can be allowed to be considered an "original score". How do you report something like this? Legally I mean. Not in regards to wikipedia, but I mean otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.8.50.83 (talk) 04:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 99.102.96.44 (talk) 02:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC) The song referred to in the article is nothing at all like the song from "The Lady in Ermine" other than the title. Not only are the lyrics totally different, again, except for the title, but the melody is nothing like the song referenced. Nor are there drastic similarities in the chord structure of these two songs. There was no need for the song writers to travel back in time to write this song. A quick listen to the song will suffice to convince any objective listener.

“In the key of E”
From the intro: "in the key of E."

How is this relevant? This seems like a small detail, hardly relevant in a Wikipedia article.

It's hard to interpret this without any statement of the original key. I'd suggest deleting it. Omc (talk) 15:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)