Talk:Thomas's pika

A pika by any other name
I know you said that also known as Lagamorpha-Ochotonidae is not 'another name', but the source says otherwise. I am no expert in this field, but I do rely on what the source says. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 18:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 7&6=thirteen Yeah, actually what it means in the source is Lagamorpha is the order and Ochotonidae is the family the species is present in. If you look at Ochotona rutila or Ochotona thibetana, for instance, in the same source, you could see the same Lagamorpha-Ochotonidae mentioned, as they belong to the same order, same family too! Had it been another name for this species, it had to be another name for those other species too, which is not the case, as they cannot have the same name. Adityavagarwal (talk) 19:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Wilson citations missing
We don't seem to have in this article the citations to books by Wilson. These are common in the other Pika articles we have been working on. There are lots of relevant sources listed here. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 17:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Replied here Adityavagarwal (talk) 22:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)