Talk:Thomas Aquinas/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The prose is stubby at times. The sections "Sacraments" and "Various topics" need to contain summaries of the corresponding main articles.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There are too few inline citations, particularly in the later part. Some direct quotes stand without citations, as well as several complex points that need references (e.g. the section "Revelation").
 * Better sources could have been used. The extensive use of Hampden, from 1848, should be replaced by more recent scholarship.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * See comment above about summaries of sub-articles.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Lampman (talk) 16:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Lampman (talk) 16:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Since no significant improvements have been made to the article over the last week, I will now delist it. Lampman (talk) 12:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Some suggestions
Can someone expend section Biographies. There are just one sentence. Also I suggest some shorter captions in section about his life. --Vojvodaeist 11:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Image
I think that previous image in infobox is more renowned.--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 21:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)