Talk:Thomas Brunner/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 02:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll review this one within the week. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Service with the New Zealand Company
 * "In 1844" - add a comma ✅


 * Later life
 * "... but with the proviso that he would able to take on private work which did not interfere with his duties." This seems to be missing a word. ✅


 * Retirement and death
 * "By mid-April 1874" - add a comma ✅

This is a very well-written article which really draws in the reader. I found only nitpicky items to mention. Let me know when you want me to return to the review so that I can pass it. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Firstly, thank you for taking the time to review this article, it is greatly appreciated. I have fixed the three issues that you have identified above so hopefully it is now satisfactory. Thanks again. Zawed (talk) 07:50, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: