Talk:Thomas E. Klocek

Untitled
I tried to add a little more information, I will add some more backround info, and info about the issue tommorow.

___________________________________________________________________________

I added some more info to the aftermath section and will continue updating this page.

I corrected a grammatical error in the section titled Kloceks views.

I also added the quotation mark to the title: Klocek's views

Some editing
Did some editing: punctuation, capitalization, grammar, made the links look better, made quotes from the article flow smoother in the text, added one link, removed the picture section (there was no picture linked), and combined both "external links" sections into one. I tried to make sure no URLs actually showed: it looks very ugly. If someone thinks I should add more links from conservative blogs, portraying their perspective or statements, I can. Kitabparast 23:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

This is not an encyclopedia article. This is propaganda, and should be either removed, or improved. And putting in things from a conservative blog is just as silly as putting things in from a marxist blog.

Yeah this feels almost like Klocek wrote this himself.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Thomas E. Klocek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://abclocal.go.com/wls/news/030105_ns_depaul_prof.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)